Kos: Why does it matter if Michael Brown hit Darren Wilson in the eye?

Ad Blocker Detected

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading. We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads! We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising. Please add US to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

http://twitter.com/#!/markos/status/502553272608387073

The anti-cop narrative surrounding the fatal shooting of Michael Brown by officer Darren Wilson is falling apart. The latest shoe to drop: The disclosure that Brown may have struck Wilson in the face just prior to the shooting. (Wilson’s eye socket may or may not have been fractured, but as Hot Air’s Allahpundit notes, “what’s apparently not in dispute is that Wilson somehow emerged from the incident with part of his face swollen.”)

Liberal blogger Markos Moulitsas appear to believe that none of it matters: Brown was shot by a cop; therefore, the cop is at fault.

Like we said the other day, when you’re a liberal, it’s always the cops’ fault.

His readers tried to help him understand:

http://twitter.com/#!/Steven_Patz/status/502555145201528833
http://twitter.com/#!/ChermesePython/status/502557132148211712
http://twitter.com/#!/DesertedOdds/status/502565545959759872

It really isn’t all that complicated.

Related:

Howard Kurtz: ‘Shoplifting’ video sheds no light on what happened in Michael Brown shooting

 

 

Read more: http://twitchy.com/2014/08/22/markos-moulitsas-why-does-it-matter-if-michael-brown-hit-darren-wilson-in-the-eye/

Leave a Reply

Privacy Preference Center